USGS - science for a changing world

New Jersey Water Science Center

  home   water data   projects   publications   hazards   news   about us   contact   webcams

ARCHIVED GROUND-WATER MODELS

USGS IN YOUR STATE

USGS Water Science Centers are located in each state.

There is a USGS Water Science Center office in each State. Washington Oregon California Idaho Nevada Montana Wyoming Utah Colorado Arizona New Mexico North Dakota South Dakota Nebraska Kansas Oklahoma Texas Minnesota Iowa Missouri Arkansas Louisiana Wisconsin Illinois Mississippi Michigan Indiana Ohio Kentucky Tennessee Alabama Pennsylvania West Virginia Georgia Florida Caribbean Alaska Hawaii New York Vermont New Hampshire Maine Massachusetts South Carolina North Carolina Rhode Island Virginia Connecticut New Jersey Maryland-Delaware-D.C.

Provided in cooperation with New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

NJ DEP Logo.

Program to Maintain and Update Groundwater Models
RASA-NJ

Groundwater flow in the New Jersey Coastal Plain

By Mary Martin

Map of the model's study area

STATUS: Superseded by RASA-98

MODEL TYPE/VERSION: MODFLOW-96, steady state and transient

AREA STUDIED: New Jersey Coastal Plain

AQUIFERS SIMULATED: 10 regional New Jersey Coastal Plain aquifers

MOST RECENT WITHDRAWALS SIMULATED: 1981

MODEL SIZE: 10 layers, 29 rows, 51 columns

MINIMUM GRID SPACING:2.5 miles x 2.5 miles

REPORT SERIES AND NUMBER: USGS Professional Paper 1404-H

REPORT URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/pubs/pp/pp1404H

ADDITIONAL REPORTS USING THIS MODEL: WRI 92-4152 || WRI 88-4199

Download this set of model files Original RASA model not available. See RASA-98.

Report Abstract

Groundwater flow was simulated in 10 aquifers and 9 intervening confining units of the New Jersey Coastal Plain, which consists of unconsolidated gravel, sand, silt, and clay of early Cretaceous to Holocene age. A multilayer finite-difference model was used to simulate both prepumping steady-state conditions and transient conditions from 1896 through 1980. Model calibration indicates that the highest transmissivity, greater than 10,000 feet squared per day, is in Camden and Gloucester Counties in the three Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifers; in Monmouth and Ocean Counties in the middle Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer; in Atlantic and Cape May Counties in the confined Kirkwood aquifer; and in Ocean, Burlington, Atlantic, and Cape May Counties in the lower and upper Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifers. Confining-unit vertical leakance is highest, greater than 1x103 feet per day per foot, in updip areas and lowest, less than 1x105 feet per day per foot, in downdip areas.

Sensitivity analyses show that the model was useful in refining initial estimates of transmissivity and confining unit vertical leakance near the major cones of depression, and that the assumptions associated with the lateral and downdip boundary conditions do not seriously limit the usefulness of the model results. However, simulated water levels near the major cones of depression, in several aquifers, are fairly sensitive to parts of the model framework, including confining-unit characteristics along the outcrop of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifers, the updip limit of the confined Kirkwood aquifer, and the downdip limit of the upper and lower sand units of the Englishtown aquifer system.

Calibration and sensitivity analysis also show that aquifer storage coefficients are about 1x104, except in downdip areas of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifers, where they may be as much as eight times higher. Confining-unit specific storage is about 6x106 per foot. Areas near the center of the major cones of depression in the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy, Englishtown, Wenonah-Mount Laurel, and Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifers approximate steady-state conditions in 1981. However, downdip and offshore areas are under transient-flow conditions. Simulated changes in water levels along the saltwater- freshwater interface boundary (the occurrence of groundwater with greater than 10,000 milligrams per liter chloride concentrations) indicate that the lower Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer and the confined Kirkwood aquifer have the greatest potential for movement of the interface. However, simulated hydraulic gradients within the aquifers near the interface boundary cannot be used to quantify movement of the interface. The simulated sources of water to wells in 1978 include 3 percent from aquifer storage, 3 percent from boundary flows, 4 percent from the ocean and bays, and 90 percent from decreased discharge to or increased recharge from streams--that is, a reduction in streamflow.

The prepumping regional flow system recharged in upland areas in Mercer, Middlesex, and western Monmouth Counties; in western Ocean and central Burlington Counties; and in central Gloucester and Camden Counties and discharged to the Atlantic Ocean, Delaware River, Delaware Bay, Raritan Bay, and large rivers in the Coastal Plain. Under pumping conditions, regional cones of depression formed in the three Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifers, Englishtown aquifer, Wenonah-Mount Laurel aquifer, and the confined Kirkwood aquifer.

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://nj.usgs.gov/special/mod_maint/info/info_rasa.html
Page Contact Information: New Jersey WSC Webmaster
Page Last Modified: Tuesday, 15-Jan-2013 08:05:29 EST